Seattle U.
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
436  Sophie Curatilo SR 20:51
654  Taylor de Laveaga JR 21:08
854  Lila Rice SO 21:23
1,015  Elena Smith JR 21:34
1,802  Moira O'Connor Lenth SO 22:22
1,904  Madison Davis SR 22:28
2,723  Johanna Erickson FR 23:28
2,763  Rebecca Lassere JR 23:32
2,971  Emily Hedberg JR 23:52
2,993  Meghan Arigo SR 23:55
3,204  Haley Kruell SR 24:24
National Rank #142 of 341
West Region Rank #22 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 44.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sophie Curatilo Taylor de Laveaga Lila Rice Elena Smith Moira O'Connor Lenth Madison Davis Johanna Erickson Rebecca Lassere Emily Hedberg Meghan Arigo Haley Kruell
Portland State Viking Classic 10/04 1173 20:51 21:15 21:40 21:48 22:20 22:02 23:25 23:05 22:39 23:55 24:14
Beaver Classic 10/24 1518 23:32 23:27 23:30 24:37
WAC Championships 11/01 1167 20:57 21:16 21:10 21:38 22:21 22:14 23:24 24:34 23:59
West Region Championships 11/14 1102 20:49 20:47 21:24 21:14 22:31 23:59 24:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.9 605 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.4 3.4 5.6 8.5 11.5 13.1 14.5 12.0 10.3 8.7 5.8 2.8 1.3 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sophie Curatilo 0.0% 144.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sophie Curatilo 68.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Taylor de Laveaga 92.9
Lila Rice 116.4
Elena Smith 131.6
Moira O'Connor Lenth 196.8
Madison Davis 203.6
Johanna Erickson 247.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.0% 0.0 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.5% 0.5 14
15 1.4% 1.4 15
16 3.4% 3.4 16
17 5.6% 5.6 17
18 8.5% 8.5 18
19 11.5% 11.5 19
20 13.1% 13.1 20
21 14.5% 14.5 21
22 12.0% 12.0 22
23 10.3% 10.3 23
24 8.7% 8.7 24
25 5.8% 5.8 25
26 2.8% 2.8 26
27 1.3% 1.3 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0